Back to ledger
GBThe GuardianWomen's health

Stop putting women through brutal hysteroscopies without pain relief | Letters

The medical system is biased against women, says Carole Kendall, pointing to the very different way men who have colonoscopies are treated I fully endorse everything Anna Moore writes in her excellent article on the lack of pain relief for hysteroscopies (‘It was barbaric. I was crying my eyes out’: why are so many women left in agony by routine womb examinations?, 16 August). I have had three of these barbaric proce

Open original article
Ledger record
#765
First seen
19 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC
Last checked
20 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC
Version history
1 version
Current fingerprint
5e275402e6c6...3e3858
01

Publisher layer

Recorded article metadata

Publisher
The Guardian
Country
England / United Kingdom
Source published
19 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC
Source updated
No update timestamp supplied
Byline
Guardian Staff
Section
Women's health
Source-supplied excerpt
The medical system is biased against women, says Carole Kendall, pointing to the very different way men who have colonoscopies are treated I fully endorse everything Anna Moore writes in her excellent article on the lack of pain relief for hysteroscopies (‘It was barbaric. I was crying my eyes out’: why are so many women left in agony by routine womb examinations?, 16 August). I have had three of these barbaric proce
02

Change layer

Observed version timeline

  1. 1
    Initial capture

    Stop putting women through brutal hysteroscopies without pain relief | Letters

    The medical system is biased against women, says Carole Kendall, pointing to the very different way men who have colonoscopies are treated I fully endorse everything Anna Moore writes in her excellent article on the lack of pain relief for hysteroscopies (‘It was barbaric. I was crying my eyes out’: why are so many women left in agony by routine womb examinations?, 16 August). I have had three of these barbaric proce

    Changed fieldstitlebylinedescriptionTextcontentTextsourcePublishedAtsourceUpdatedAtsectionimageUrltags
    Version SHA-256
    5e275402e6c6...3e3858
    Capture SHA-256
    a9daa2ba02a9...f3ac33
03

Interpretation layer

Labels with declared origins

Not an adjudication.

Publisher categories are copied from source metadata. Machine signals report observable wording or format and do not determine truth, intent, ethics, or wrongdoing.

  • machine content-type Reported news observable-rules-v1 / 70% rule confidence
  • publisher category Doctors rss-category
  • publisher category Health rss-category
  • publisher category Hospitals rss-category
  • publisher category NHS rss-category
  • publisher category Society rss-category
  • publisher category UK news rss-category
  • publisher category Women rss-category
  • publisher category Women's health rss-category
04

Public response layer

Reception snapshots

No reviewed reception capture yet.

Comment counts and samples remain absent until a lawful, source-specific capture method is reviewed. Absence is recorded instead of estimated.

05

Evidence layer

Capture provenance

Capture ID
#149
Observed
19 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC
HTTP result
200 / parsed
Raw payload
468,190 bytes, private gzip evidence
Collector
news-ledger/0.1
Public boundary
metadata and excerpt