The Great ADHD Myth? review – the most controversial show of the year is here
Dr Max Pemberton isn’t uncompassionate or especially radical, but he assembles a team of medics whose stance on the condition is clear from the off. This is a documentary that will incense and offend many Presenter Max Pemberton, a psychiatrist in the NHS, Daily Mail columnist and author, and the experts he has assembled, waste no time in setting out their stall in The Great ADHD Myth?. This is a documentary that wil
Open original article- Ledger record
- #389
- First seen
- 19 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC
- Last checked
- 20 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC
- Version history
- 1 version
- Current fingerprint
39ce9f85f91a...b7edfd
Publisher layer
Recorded article metadata
- Publisher
- The Guardian
- Country
- England / United Kingdom
- Source published
- 18 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC
- Source updated
- No update timestamp supplied
- Byline
- Lucy Mangan
- Section
- Television & radio
Dr Max Pemberton isn’t uncompassionate or especially radical, but he assembles a team of medics whose stance on the condition is clear from the off. This is a documentary that will incense and offend many Presenter Max Pemberton, a psychiatrist in the NHS, Daily Mail columnist and author, and the experts he has assembled, waste no time in setting out their stall in The Great ADHD Myth?. This is a documentary that wil
Change layer
Observed version timeline
-
1
The Great ADHD Myth? review – the most controversial show of the year is here
Dr Max Pemberton isn’t uncompassionate or especially radical, but he assembles a team of medics whose stance on the condition is clear from the off. This is a documentary that will incense and offend many Presenter Max Pemberton, a psychiatrist in the NHS, Daily Mail columnist and author, and the experts he has assembled, waste no time in setting out their stall in The Great ADHD Myth?. This is a documentary that wil
Changed fieldstitlebylinedescriptionTextcontentTextsourcePublishedAtsourceUpdatedAtsectionimageUrltags- Version SHA-256
39ce9f85f91a...b7edfd- Capture SHA-256
1abd1ae387f2...310803
Interpretation layer
Labels with declared origins
Publisher categories are copied from source metadata. Machine signals report observable wording or format and do not determine truth, intent, ethics, or wrongdoing.
- machine content-type Analysis or opinion observable-rules-v1 / 70% rule confidence
- machine language-signal Investigation language observable-rules-v1 / 65% rule confidence
- publisher category Culture rss-category
- publisher category Television rss-category
- publisher category Television & radio rss-category
Public response layer
Reception snapshots
Comment counts and samples remain absent until a lawful, source-specific capture method is reviewed. Absence is recorded instead of estimated.
Evidence layer
Capture provenance
- Capture ID
- #5
- Observed
- 19 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC
- HTTP result
- 200 / parsed
- Raw payload
- 460,971 bytes, private gzip evidence
- Collector
- news-ledger/0.1
- Public boundary
- metadata and excerpt